science
Half of social-science studies fail replication in seven-year SCORE project
A seven-year, multi-institution project found that only about half of tested social-science studies could be replicated, with poor data sharing and methodological gaps a leading cause.
Apr 1st 2026 · United States
Insights
- The SCORE project reviewed 3,900 social-science papers from 62 journals over seven years.
- When repeating full experiments, 49% of 164 focused studies were replicated with statistical significance.
- Of 600 papers tested for computational reproducibility, only 145 provided enough information and 53% of those reproduced exactly.
- In robustness tests, about 75% of 100 papers held up under alternative reasonable analyses and 2% reversed conclusions.
- Major obstacles included missing data and incomplete methodological detail, alongside legitimate variation from new analyses.
- The project was funded by DARPA and coordinated partly by the Center for Open Science to support automated confidence scoring of findings.
- Separate analyses of 2022–23 papers show higher reproducibility, suggesting disclosure norms may be improving.
Sources
- Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences www.nature.com
- ‘Replication games’ test the robustness of social-science studies www.nature.com
- Half of social-science studies fail replication test in years-long project www.nature.com
- Huge meta-research project puts claims in social-science papers to the test www.nature.com