Professor says Victorians misread Battle of Hastings
Mar 21st 2026 · World
A UEA historian says a Victorian-era misreading of medieval sources created the story that King Harold marched nearly 200 miles to Hastings, and he now argues Harold sailed south with a fleet instead.
- Tom Licence of the University of East Anglia re-examined nine Anglo Saxon Chronicle manuscripts and other 11th century sources.
- He argues the long overland march from Stamford Bridge is a Victorian misinterpretation and that Harold moved his forces south by ship with a large fleet.
- Experts at the British Museum and English Heritage called the research exciting and said it could change how historians view Harold's strategy.
- Licence will present the findings at an Oxford conference and says the Bayeux Tapestry does not contradict his case.
Articles
- The Road to the Battle of Hastings in 1066? Maybe Not a Road After All. www.nytimes.com
- Victorians got Battle of Hastings wrong, expert says www.bbc.com
- King Harold's 200-mile march to the Battle of Hastings was a 'myth', historian says www.france24.com
- King Harold’s 200-mile UK march to Battle of Hastings in 1066 is a ‘myth’, says research www.scmp.com